Comparison of Experimental and Theoretical Results of Tool Wear Rate in Electrical Discharge Machining
Parole chiave:
EDM, TWR, experiment, empirical formulaAbstract
Though electrical discharge machining (EDM) process is capable for complex and precise machining of materials irrespective of their hardness, it has certain limitations like low material removal rate (MRR), high tool wear rate (TWR), etc. which restrict its application areas. In EDM, material removal from workpiece and tool takes place by means of sparking between them which is a quite complex process. So, it is difficult to predict material removal rate and tool wear rate for various process parameters. In this paper, the experimental data available in existing literature are used to derive empirical formulas for heat distribution factor, crater radius and depth. The tool wear rate is calculated based on these formulas and validated with experimental results. For the selection of optimum process parameters, the proposed theoretical model can be used in EDM process. Cite this Article Sanghani CR, Acharya GD, K. D. Kothari. Comparison of Experimental and Theoretical Results of Tool Wear Rate in Electrical Discharge Machining. Trends in Mechanical Engineering & Technology. 2016; 6(3): 53–57p.Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form
(to be completed by authors)
I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.
· I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
· I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
· I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
· I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:
Author’s name
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
4. _______________
We Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal. |