Cast’ing People in Continuous Quality Improvement
Palabras clave:
Competitude (competence attitude), TQM, 3-S, Manusmriti, Holean Human Development (Holy, lean and Holistic), current technological revolution (CTR)Resumen
The Hindu population has been divided into 4 classes (varna’s) paradigmed by Rishi Manu. These are: Brahmin, Kshatrya, Vaishta and Shudra. This 'varna vyavastha' is an arrangement based on one's orientation for a profession aligned on one's nature. It was planned to promote high specialisation and super competencies, by integrating a system of Continuous Quality improvement (CQI) through design. ManuSamriti, thus worked as a code of law during Hindu age, Muslim rule and even during British dynasty. Whenever a fundamental change in environment is competent enough to cause failure, then it implies that either the system was week, or the change in environment too strong! Neither happened in case of ManuSamriti. Because in this case the human management system was finely divided between homogeneity and harmony; therefore it formed a critical system. Being balanced narrowly, it got rejected by default, in spite that the environment could never shake its building blocks. In performance it behaved similar to the paradigm of TQM- potent, but full of dichotomy and misunderstanding. The present work attempts to draw commonalities between TQM and Manusmriti. The positive effects and negative impacts of Manusmriti have been analyzed w.r.t. requirements, and discussed. It is ventured that within the stipulations of Manusmriti, the Quality skills were extensively displayed, and as on today, neither the Quality, nor the quantity is provided for. In the absence of this how will our society do with the requirements and where to the non-availability of requisite competencies will lead to remains to be seen?Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form
(to be completed by authors)
I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.
· I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
· I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
· I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
· I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:
Author’s name
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
_______________
We Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal. |