Functional History of Consumer Disputes Redressal Machineries of Tamil Nadu: An Analytical Study
Abstrakt
The Indian legal system has experienced a revolution with the enactment of consumer protection act 1986, which was specifically designed to redress the grievances of consumers by establishing consumer redressal machineries at the central, state and district level. They are national consumer disputes redressal commission, state consumer disputes redressal commissions and district consumer disputes redressal forums. The present paper attempts an analytical examination of the state consumer disputes redressal commission of Tamil Nadu and their district forums in redressing the grievances of consumers. The performance of these consumer forums is analyzed in terms of disposal of cases, rate of pendency, and filing of cases with some meaningful suggestions for qualitative and quantitative enhancement in its performance. Keywords: Consumers, disputes, redressal forums, consumer protection act 1986Cite this Article Anto Auxcelian M, Albin Jerome, Kshtrashal Singh et al. Functional History of Consumer Disputes Redressal Machineries of Tamil Nadu: An Analytical Study. Omniscience: A Multi-disciplinary Journal. 2017; 7(1): 35–39p.Publikováno
Číslo
Sekce
Licence
Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form
(to be completed by authors)
I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.
· I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
· I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
· I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
· I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:
Author’s name
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
_______________
We Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal. |