Comparative Analysis of Various Existing NT SRAM Cells with High Speed Low Power 8T SRAM Cell
Abstract
The high speed along with low leakage devices are in demand in current CMOS technology era. With the advancement of technology, it is a big challenge to keep the balance of sizing and other parameters such as leakage current, delay and stability. In this paper, different cell topologies 6T, 7T, 8T, 9T and 10T SRAM cell are discussed and compared with the proposed single ended 8T SRAM cell. The comparison has been carried out on different parameters like, read and write access delay, write margin, read and hold stability, and leakage current. The analysis depicts that proposed cell shows less read and write access delay which is 114.13 and 38.56 ps respectively. The 6T SRAM cell consumes highest leakage current 349.104 nA, whereas the proposed cell consumes 671.22 pA. The 9T SRAM and 10T SRAM cell shows the highest write margin, read and hold static margin. The write margin, read and hold static margin for 9T SRAM and 10T SRAM cell are 388mv, 367mv, 373mv and 387mv, 368mv, 387mv respectively; whereas for proposed 8T cell it is 310mv, 343mv and 329mv. Keywords: CMOS technology, SRAM, stability, single endedCite this Article Raikwal P, Neema V, Verma A. Comparative Analysis of Various Existing NT SRAM Cells with High Speed Low Power 8T SRAM Cell. Journal of VLSI Design Tools & Technology. 2017; 7(2): 30–36p.Zusätzliche Dateien
Veröffentlicht
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form
(to be completed by authors)
I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.
· I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
· I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
· I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
· I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:
Author’s name
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
4. _______________
We Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal. |