Cost Comparison of Post Tensioning, Prestressing and Conventional RCC Design
Abstrakt
The aim of project is to check the cost effectiveness of Post-Tensioning Slab with other design methods. For that purpose multipurpose hall is chosen with the footprint of 6 x 8 m having the total slab area is (768 sq. m). The analysis done by hand calculation and using the following methods: 1) Flat Plate (Without Drop and capital ) and Post-Tensioning Slab by using equivalent frame methods 2) Flat slab with Drop and capital by using Direct Design methods and 3) Grid Slab by using IS code Methods. It is also an analysis by using M 35 and Fe 415 grade of concrete and steel. After designing the slab thickness of slab, total dead load, moments, shear stress and over all construction cost are compared. It concludes that construction cost of grid slab is more economical than other three methods for particular span of slab. Keywords: Post-Tensioning Slab, Design Methods, Flat Slab, Grid SlabCite this ArticleAditya Pande, Khandare N. V., Cost Comparison of Post Tensioning, Prestressing and Conventional RCC Design, Journal of Construction Engineering, Technology and Management. 2015; 5(2): 1–8p.
Publikováno
Číslo
Sekce
Licence
Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form
(to be completed by authors)
I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the manuscript entitled ‘______________’, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the Journal, is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.
I/ We have read the final version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship. We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:
Author’s name Signature (s)
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
4. ________________
